Bernabé Mallo
Doctor en Filosofía por la Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU)
Investigador
en neurofilosofía, evolución humana y origen del arte. / PhD in
Philosophy – University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)
Researcher in neurophilosophy, human evolution, and the origins of art.
A review of Winfried Menninghaus' book (2019): Aesthetics after Darwin: The Multiple Origins and Functions of the Arts
Introduction: beyond "singing for sex"
Why do human beings devote time and energy to activities that do not appear to have any immediate utilitarian value? Why do we paint, sing, dance, or tell stories? The question of the origin and function of art has been one of the great questions of philosophy and, more recently, of evolutionary science.
Winfried Menninghaus, Director of the Department of Language and Literature at the Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics in Frankfurt, published in 2019 Aesthetics after Darwin: The Multiple Origins and Functions of the Arts (translated into English by Alexandra Berlina), a work that critically reviews evolutionary hypotheses about art . The book, which updates its original German version of 2011, offers a lucid synthesis of current debates and proposes a novel model for understanding the emergence of the arts in our species .
Menninghaus' central thesis is that art has neither a single origin nor an exclusive function. In contrast to theories that privilege one explanation over others —whether sexual selection, social cooperation, or self-formation— the author argues that the human arts emerged as the result of the confluence of several independent evolutionary factors that combined and transformed each other. The metaphor of the "peacock's tale" used by a reviewer is apt: art is a phenomenon as complex as the plumage of this bird, and cannot be reduced to a single narrative .
From the perspective of our research on the S/Y/C model and Surgical Philosophy, Menninghaus' work offers valuable conceptual tools for understanding art as a biological and symbolic phenomenon, without reducing it either to a mere instinct or to an arbitrary cultural construction (Mallo, 2023, 2025, 2026a, 2026b). His pluralistic approach resonates with our thesis that art is an expression of the single function of the nervous system in its three dimensions: survival, symbol, and wholeness.
The three functions of art according to the evolutionary debate
Menninghaus identifies three major functional hypotheses about art that have dominated the evolutionary debate and which, far from being mutually exclusive, can be conceived as different aspects of the same process . Let us examine each one.
1. Sexual selection: competition and aesthetic choice
Menninghaus' starting point is, naturally, Charles Darwin. In The Descent of Man (1871), Darwin proposed that artistic production —particularly singing, dancing, and poetry— was a product of sexual selection, similar to the showy plumage of peacocks or the song of songbirds . Individuals who developed more striking artistic skills would have greater success in courtship and, therefore, leave more offspring.
Menninghaus devotes the first chapter to analysing this model, showing that Darwinian theory is much richer and more nuanced than is often believed . Darwin did not reduce art to mere sexual display; he also recognised the role of the "sense of beauty" as a fundamental human capacity, and drew inspiration from the tradition of classical rhetoric and philosophical aesthetics (especially German and English) to formulate his ideas . "Singing for sex," in Darwin's hands, was not a simplistic explanation, but a complex hypothesis that connected biology with culture.
2. Social cooperation: art as community bond
The second major hypothesis that Menninghaus examines is that which situates the origin of art in the need for social cooperation . In contrast to Darwin's competitive model, authors such as John R. Krebs and Richard Dawkins have proposed that art —or at least its precursors— might have evolved as a signal of cooperation and group cohesion .
The argument is as follows: human beings are social animals that depend on collaboration to survive. Art, by creating shared experiences, collective rituals, and common narratives, would strengthen group bonds, increase trust, and facilitate coordination. This social function of art is perhaps the one that has received the most attention in anthropology and archaeology, and connects with the role of art in the formation of group identities and the transmission of cultural values .
Menninghaus does not exclusively endorse this hypothesis, but values it as a legitimate and complementary alternative to sexual selection. His analysis reveals that the two functions —competitive and cooperative— can coexist in different contexts and are often intertwined in concrete artistic practices.
3. Ontogenetic self-formation: art as personal transformation
The third hypothesis that Menninghaus considers is that of art as a tool for ontogenetic self-transformation . This perspective, closer to the tradition of "aesthetic education" or "liberal education," emphasises the role of art in individual development, in the formation of subjectivity, and in the search for meaning.
Art would not only be a means of attracting mates or bonding groups, but also a space for inner exploration, emotional expression, and identity construction. This function, although less explored in the evolutionary framework, is central to understanding why people engage in art throughout their lives, beyond its reproductive or social utility. Menninghaus notes that this dimension is not incompatible with the previous ones; in fact, it could be their subjective correlate: the experience of personal transformation that accompanies artistic creation and contemplation.
The "cooptation" model: an innovative synthesis
Menninghaus' most original contribution is his "cooptation model" to explain the multiple origins of the human arts . In contrast to the idea that art is a specific adaptation for a concrete function, Menninghaus proposes that it emerged as a new behavioural variant when three ancient and largely independent adaptations were brought together and transformed by human capacities for symbolic cognition and language .
These three adaptations would be:
Sensory and sexual selection biases related to visual and auditory beauty (the "sense of beauty" that Darwin mentioned).
Play behaviour, which in many species serves to explore, practise skills, and develop creativity.
Technology, understood as the capacity to make and use tools, which expanded the repertoire of material possibilities for artistic expression.
These three capacities, which evolved for independent reasons (sexual selection, cognitive development, and practical survival), merged in humans thanks to the emergence of language and symbolic thought. The confluence of these factors gave rise to behaviours that did not exist before: painting figures on cave walls, sculpting figurines, composing songs, weaving narratives.
Menninghaus coins the term "cooptation" (rather than "exaptation," the more common term coined by Gould and Vrba) to emphasise that these capacities were not simply "recycled" for a new function, but were radically transformed upon coming into contact with symbolic cognition . Art is not a by-product of sexual selection nor a mere instrument of social cohesion; it is the result of a systemic reconfiguration of several pre-existing capacities.
Connection with research on the origin of art (S/Y/C)
Menninghaus' model resonates deeply with the research we have been developing on the S/Y/C model of neuronal functioning and the Law of Biological Coherence (Mallo, 2023, 2025, 2026a, 2026b). His pluralistic approach and emphasis on the confluence of diverse factors finds an echo in our thesis that art is an expression of the single function of the nervous system, which manifests itself in three inseparable dimensions.
The S (Survival) dimension corresponds to the adaptive function of art that Menninghaus explores through sexual selection and social cooperation. Art, in its origin, is not a disinterested luxury; it is rooted in biological needs: attracting mates, strengthening bonds, improving group cohesion. Even play behaviour and technology, which Menninghaus identifies as precursors of art, ultimately serve survival, skill development, and adaptation to the environment.
The Y (Symbolon) dimension is central to understanding the transformation that Menninghaus describes. Symbolic capacity —language, symbolic cognition— is the catalyst that turns sensory biases, play, and technology into properly human art. Symbolon is not merely a representation, but an act of recognition through shared codes. When art becomes symbol, it transcends its immediate biological function to become a vehicle of meaning, of communication of experiences, of world-building. Menninghaus, although he does not use this term, describes precisely this qualitative leap.
The C (Wholeness) dimension points to the human need for totality, to integrate parts into a coherent whole. Art, in its function of ontogenetic self-formation, satisfies that need: the work of art offers a closed totality, a complete symbolic world that orders experience. This function, which Menninghaus identifies as one of the three functional hypotheses, connects with the deepest drive of the nervous system toward coherence and meaning.
Surgical Philosophy invites us to make a precise analytical cut in Menninghaus' model. It is not about choosing between the different functions of art —sexual selection, cooperation, self-formation— but about distinguishing levels. Each of these functions operates at a different level: biological, social, psychological. Art integrates them all because the single function of the nervous system (S/Y/C) unfolds at all these levels simultaneously. Menninghaus is right to reject functional monolithism; our thesis offers a foundation for understanding why the functions are multiple without being contradictory.
Implications for research on the origin of art
Menninghaus' book has profound implications for research on the origin of art in the Homo species. First, it reminds us that art does not have a single starting point. Archaeological evidence suggests that different artistic practices —body adornment, cave painting, music— may have emerged at different times and for different reasons. There is no "zero moment" of art, but a gradual and multiple emergence .
Second, the cooptation model offers a framework for understanding the relationship between continuity and discontinuity in the evolution of art. Human art is not an absolute novelty; it is based on capacities we share with other animals: preferences for certain visual and auditory stimuli, play behaviour, tool use. But the emergence of symbolic cognition and language transforms these capacities into something radically new: a system of meaning production that has no equivalent in the animal world.
Third, the book underscores the importance of interdisciplinarity in addressing the origin of art. Menninghaus integrates evolutionary biology, archaeology, anthropology, philosophy, and literary theory . His approach is an example of how research on art must overcome disciplinary compartments to achieve a richer and more complete understanding. Our own research, which integrates neuroscience, philosophy, psychology, and anthropology, is part of this same tradition.
Final considerations: art as an encounter of forces
Winfried Menninghaus' book offers a vision of art that is both humble and ambitious. Humble because it recognises that there is no single answer to the question of the origin and function of art. Ambitious because it proposes a novel synthesis that integrates the different perspectives into a common framework.
Art, according to Menninghaus, is neither a blind instinct nor an arbitrary cultural construction. It is the result of the confluence of several evolutionary forces, which are transformed upon coming into contact with the human capacity to create symbols. Art is, in this sense, an encounter: between biology and culture, between need and desire, between body and mind.
From our research, we add that this encounter is possible because the human nervous system is, in its single function, an integrative device. There is no contradiction between the different functions of art because all of them are expressions of the same S/Y/C dynamic. Art helps us to survive, to symbolise, and to achieve wholeness. And in this triple dimension lies its power, its persistence, and its mystery.
References
Mallo, B. (2023). La construcción neuro-simbólica. Una aproximación al funcionamiento del cerebro desde una perspectiva multidisciplinar [Doctoral thesis, University of the Basque Country - Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea]. ADDI Repository. http://hdl.handle.net/10810/62701
Mallo, B. (2025). Arte y biología: Una aproximación neurofilosófica al origen de la experiencia estética. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0E8Y5WZMK
Mallo, B. (2025). Art and biology: A neurophilosophical approach to the origin of aesthetic experience. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0E8Y6C2XN
Mallo, B. (2026a). De la filosofía quirúrgica a la ley de coherencia biológica S/Y/C: Hacia una investigación sobre el origen del arte en la especie Homo. https://isbn.bibna.gub.uy/catalogo.php?mode=detalle&nt=57196
Mallo, B. (2026a). De la filosofía quirúrgica a la ley de coherencia biológica S/Y/C: Hacia una investigación sobre el origen del arte en la especie Homo [Kindle edition]. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0GYGTJD5C
Mallo, B. (2026b). From surgical philosophy to the law of biological coherence S/Y/C: Toward a study of the origin of art in the Homo lineage. https://isbn.bibna.gub.uy/catalogo.php?mode=detalle&nt=57197
Menninghaus, W. (2019). Aesthetics after Darwin: The multiple origins and functions of the arts (A. Berlina, Trans.). Academic Studies Press. (Original work published 2011)
Autor / Author
Bernabé Mallo
Doctor en Filosofía – Universidad del País Vasco / Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (UPV/EHU)
Investigador independiente en neurofilosofía, evolución humana y origen del arte.
Bernabé Mallo
PhD in Philosophy – University of the Basque Country / Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (UPV/EHU)
Independent researcher in neurophilosophy, human evolution, and the origin of art.
Enlaces / Links
Página de autor Amazon / Amazon Author Page: https://www.amazon.com/author/bernabemallo
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9002-9728
Plataforma EHUenRed / Link EHUenRed: https://www.ehu.eus/es/web/masterrak-eta-graduondokoak/red-latinoamericana-de-posgrados
Canal YouTube / Channel YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@neuroideas815
Canal YouTube / Channel YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBsf6OZ482NjST6QA-hvYtQ
Publicaciones y proyectos en desarrollo / Publications and projects:
https://www.amazon.com/author/bernabemallo
https://ehuenred.theglocal.network/ideas/el-origen-del-arte-en-el-cerebro-de-makapansgat-al-moma-del-primate-al-sapiens