viernes, 14 de agosto de 2026

The Three Revolutions of the Mind: Our Species' Cognitive Journey According to Merlin Donald

 

Bernabé Mallo

Doctor en Filosofía por la Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU)
Investigador en neurofilosofía, evolución humana y origen del arte. / PhD in Philosophy – University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)
Researcher in neurophilosophy, human evolution, and the origins of art.

 

A review of Merlin Donald's book (1991): Origins of the Modern Mind: Three Stages in the Evolution of Culture and Cognition


Introduction: the definitive question

How did the human mind acquire its incomparable power? This question, which Merlin Donald considers the "definitive question" of the life sciences, runs through his work Origins of the Modern Mind: Three Stages in the Evolution of Culture and Cognition, published in 1991 . Donald, professor of psychology and cognitive neuroscience at Queen's University (Canada) and later at Case Western Reserve University, proposes in this book an original theory of the evolution of human cognition that has profoundly influenced neuroanthropology and evolutionary psychology.

Donald's central thesis is that the human mind is not the product of a single evolutionary leap, but of three radical cognitive transitions that have taken place over the last two million years . Each of these transitions has endowed our species with a new system for representing reality and a new form of culture. The result is a hybrid mental architecture, composed of vestiges of earlier biological stages and new external symbolic devices that have radically altered its organisation.

Donald's proposal sits at the intersection of palaeontology, linguistics, anthropology, cognitive science, and, most relevantly, neuropsychology. His approach emphasises cognition as the mediator between brain and culture, in an iterative loop in which changes at one level reverberate through the others. This perspective connects directly with the interests of our research, which seeks to understand art as an emergent phenomenon of the interaction between biology, cognition, and social environment.


The first transition: mimetic culture

The first great cognitive transition, according to Donald, took place with the appearance of Homo erectus, approximately two million years ago . At this time, our ancestors acquired mimetic skill: the capacity to represent knowledge through voluntary motor acts, deliberately and systematically.

Mimesis is, in Donald's words, the "key adaptation" that initiated the human journey . It is not the simple imitation that we also find in other primates, but a much more sophisticated capacity: that of rehearsing and refining body movements, remembering those rehearsals, and reproducing them on demand . This ability allowed early hominins to create pre-linguistic representations of reality through gestures, rituals, dances, and crafts.

Evidence for this capacity is found in the very existence of very ancient stone tools, which cannot be manufactured without the capacity for systematic rehearsal and without the ability to imagine an idealised execution. As Donald notes, Palaeolithic toolmakers learned their skills in the same way modern humans do: by imagining their executions in a social context and representing them as dramatic scenarios.

Mimetic culture has several crucial consequences. First, it profoundly modifies the primate mind, giving rise to what Donald calls "mimetic imagination": the capacity to imagine and modify one's own actions . Second, it transforms culture, creating a shared performance space where roles can be enacted and rehearsed . This culture of performance and stagecraft remains alive today in sport, ritual, and the performing arts.


The second transition: mythic culture

The second cognitive transition coincides with the development of spoken language, probably in the early populations of Homo sapiens . Mimetic capacity served as a preadaptation for this development, providing the foundation for symbolic communication.

With language, humans acquired the capacity to represent reality through words, to construct narratives, to transmit complex knowledge from generation to generation. This transition gave rise to "mythic" culture, characterised by storytelling, the creation of myths, and the construction of shared cosmologies. Mythic culture enabled our species to develop complex pre-literate societies, which still survive in many parts of the world.

The importance of language in this process cannot be overstated. As Donald notes, the properties of brain, culture, and cognition have co-evolved in a "tight iterative loop", where the main event of human evolution has occurred at the cognitive level, mediating change at the anatomical and cultural levels. Language, by enabling the transmission of symbolic information, accelerated this co-evolutionary process.


The third transition: symbolic and technological culture

The third and final transition, which Donald places at the development of writing and external symbolic systems (cuneiform, hieroglyphics, alphabets, mathematics), represented an even more radical change than the previous ones . With the invention of these systems, human biological memory became an inadequate vehicle for storing and processing collective knowledge.

This is the moment when our species began to externalise its memory. External symbols —engraved in stone, written on papyri, printed in books— became a new type of "storage device" that exponentially expanded the mind's capacity to retain and manipulate information . Symbolic literacy, according to Donald, consists of the complex set of skills necessary to interact with this external memory system.

The most profound consequence of this transition is that the architecture of human memory has been altered. We no longer need to store all information in our biological memory; we can delegate part of that load to the external system. This has changed the way the human brain deploys its resources and, with it, the shape of modern culture.

Donald notes that this transition is far from complete. Computer technology intensifies the changes initiated by writing, offering even more extensive capacities for external storage and retrieval of information . His observation, formulated in 1991, is even more relevant in the age of artificial intelligence and virtual reality.


The hybrid mind: vestiges and new devices

One of Donald's most original contributions is his conception of the modern mind as a hybrid structure. We have not abandoned the capacities of earlier stages; we have integrated them. The modern mind contains vestiges of mimetic cognition (in dance, ritual, sport), of linguistic cognition (in language and narrative), and of external symbolic cognition (in reading, writing, and mathematical thinking).

This hybrid architecture is revealed, according to Donald, in the way the mind breaks down after brain injury. The independence of the three representational systems —mimetic, linguistic, and external symbolic— suggests that they are supported by distinct, though interconnected, neural mechanisms.

Furthermore, Donald notes that humans are "symbol-using creatures", but that the symbol is not a fixed mental module. It is the product of an inventive capacity that unfolds in the social sphere . Each of the three systems is based on an inventive capacity, and the products of those capacities —languages, symbols, gestures, rituals, images— continue to be invented and evaluated on the social stage.


Parallels with the S/Y/C model: an integrative reading

Donald's theory and the S/Y/C model of neuronal functioning that forms the core of our research (Mallo, 2023, 2025, 2026a, 2026b) converge on several fundamental points, despite starting from different disciplines and levels of analysis. While Donald traces cognitive evolution through cultural transitions, our proposal focuses on the single function of the nervous system. This convergence is not coincidental: both perspectives point to the same reality, that of a species that has been weaving its mind over time, integrating successive layers of capacities.

The S (Survival) dimension finds its evolutionary correlate in Donald's mimetic culture. The capacity to rehearse and refine actions, to imagine idealised executions, is a tool of adaptation that improves the ability of human groups to obtain resources, process food, make tools, and ultimately survive. Mimetic culture, as Donald notes, is the platform on which all complex performance, including language, has been built . Palaeolithic stone tools, which cannot be manufactured without the capacity for systematic rehearsal, are a testament to this adaptation . The neuronal function we call S is not an abstraction: it is the biological basis that made possible the development of mimetic capacity.

The Y (Symbolon) dimension is illuminated by the second transition, that of language and mythic culture. Language is symbolon par excellence: a system of shared codes that enables mutual recognition, the transmission of meaning, and the construction of symbolic worlds. Mythic culture, with its stories and cosmologies, is a manifestation of the human capacity to create symbols that transcend immediate experience. Palaeolithic cave art, which Donald situates within the context of mythic culture, is an expression of this symbolic capacity. Y is not, therefore, a cultural add-on, but the manifestation of a neuronal function that is activated and developed within the context of culture.

The C (Wholeness) dimension manifests in the third transition, that of external symbolic systems. Writing, mathematics, and external storage systems are tools for closing forms, for creating coherent totalities from fragments of information. The drive toward wholeness, which in art manifests as the need to create finished works, extends here to the entire domain of knowledge. External symbolic systems allow us to construct cognitive totalities that transcend the capacities of individual biological memory. C is, in this sense, the impulse that leads us to complete and close circuits of meaning, whether in a work of art or in a system of knowledge.

Donald does not use our language, but his description of the three cognitive transitions points in the same direction. What he describes as the emergence of new capacities for representation —mimetic, linguistic, and external symbolic— is the manifestation, at the level of culture, of a single neuronal function that unfolds in three concatenated dimensions. The hybrid mind that Donald describes is the result of this concatenation, in which each new layer does not replace the previous one, but integrates and transforms it. This is precisely the principle that underlies the Law of Biological Coherence S/Y/C.


Final considerations: the continuing evolution of the mind

Merlin Donald's book reminds us that the evolution of the human mind is not a concluded process. As he notes in his 1993 Précis, "cognitive evolution is not yet complete: the externalisation of memory has altered the actual architecture of memory within which humans think" . We are in the midst of a third transition that has not yet revealed all its consequences.

The question Donald poses at the end of his work —and which we can make our own— is how this externalisation of memory is changing the way humans think and, with it, the shape of our culture. Digital technology, artificial intelligence, and external storage devices are the direct heirs of the earliest symbolic systems. The modern mind, hybrid and constantly evolving, remains an open project.

As Donald notes, when we study literate adults living in technologically advanced societies, we are observing a subtype that is no more typical of the entire human species than, for example, members of a hunter-gatherer group . Our science, our philosophy, and our art would be shaped differently if they had been based on a different type of culture. Understanding this cognitive diversity, and how it has been shaped over the three great transitions, is essential for understanding who we are and where we are going.


References

Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Harvard University Press.

Donald, M. (1993). Précis of Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16(4), 737–748. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00032647

Mallo, B. (2023). La construcción neuro-simbólica. Una aproximación al funcionamiento del cerebro desde una perspectiva multidisciplinar [Doctoral thesis, University of the Basque Country - Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea]. ADDI Repository. http://hdl.handle.net/10810/62701

Mallo, B. (2025). Arte y biología: Una aproximación neurofilosófica al origen de la experiencia estética. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0E8Y5WZMK

Mallo, B. (2025). Art and biology: A neurophilosophical approach to the origin of aesthetic experience. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0E8Y6C2XN

Mallo, B. (2026a). De la filosofía quirúrgica a la ley de coherencia biológica S/Y/C: Hacia una investigación sobre el origen del arte en la especie Homo. https://isbn.bibna.gub.uy/catalogo.php?mode=detalle&nt=57196

Mallo, B. (2026a). De la filosofía quirúrgica a la ley de coherencia biológica S/Y/C: Hacia una investigación sobre el origen del arte en la especie Homo [Kindle edition]. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0GYGTJD5C

Mallo, B. (2026b). From surgical philosophy to the law of biological coherence S/Y/C: Toward a study of the origin of art in the Homo lineage. https://isbn.bibna.gub.uy/catalogo.php?mode=detalle&nt=57197


Autor / Author


Bernabé Mallo
 Doctor en Filosofía – Universidad del País Vasco / Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (UPV/EHU)
 Investigador independiente en neurofilosofía, evolución humana y origen del arte.
 

Bernabé Mallo
 PhD in Philosophy – University of the Basque Country / Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (UPV/EHU)
 Independent researcher in neurophilosophy, human evolution, and the origin of art.

Enlaces / Links


Página de autor Amazon / Amazon Author Page: https://www.amazon.com/author/bernabemallo
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9002-9728
Plataforma EHUenRed / Link EHUenRed:  https://www.ehu.eus/es/web/masterrak-eta-graduondokoak/red-latinoamericana-de-posgrados
Canal YouTube / Channel YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@neuroideas815
Canal YouTube / Channel YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBsf6OZ482NjST6QA-hvYtQ
Publicaciones y proyectos en desarrollo / Publications and projects: 
https://www.amazon.com/author/bernabemallo
https://ehuenred.theglocal.network/ideas/el-origen-del-arte-en-el-cerebro-de-makapansgat-al-moma-del-primate-al-sapiens



Las tres revoluciones de la mente: el viaje cognitivo de nuestra especie según Merlin Donald

 

Bernabé Mallo

Doctor en Filosofía por la Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU)
Investigador en neurofilosofía, evolución humana y origen del arte. / PhD in Philosophy – University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)
Researcher in neurophilosophy, human evolution, and the origins of art.

 

Una reseña del libro de Merlin Donald (1991): Origins of the Modern Mind: Three Stages in the Evolution of Culture and Cognition


Introducción: la pregunta definitiva

¿Cómo adquirió la mente humana su poder incomparable? Esta pregunta, que Merlin Donald considera la "cuestión definitiva" de las ciencias de la vida, atraviesa su obra Origins of the Modern Mind: Three Stages in the Evolution of Culture and Cognition, publicada en 1991. Donald, profesor de psicología y neurociencia cognitiva en la Universidad de Queen's (Canadá) y posteriormente en la Case Western Reserve University, propone en este libro una teoría original sobre la evolución de la cognición humana que ha influido profundamente en la neuroantropología y la psicología evolutiva.

La tesis central de Donald es que la mente humana no es el producto de un único salto evolutivo, sino de tres transiciones cognitivas radicales que han tenido lugar a lo largo de los últimos dos millones de años. Cada una de estas transiciones ha dotado a nuestra especie de un nuevo sistema de representación de la realidad y una nueva forma de cultura. El resultado es una arquitectura mental híbrida, compuesta por vestigios de etapas biológicas anteriores y por nuevos dispositivos simbólicos externos que han alterado radicalmente su organización.

La propuesta de Donald se sitúa en la intersección de la paleontología, la lingüística, la antropología, la ciencia cognitiva y, de manera especialmente relevante, la neuropsicología. Su enfoque enfatiza la cognición como el mediador entre el cerebro y la cultura, en un bucle iterativo en el que los cambios en uno de estos niveles repercuten en los demás . Esta perspectiva conecta directamente con los intereses de nuestra investigación, que busca comprender el arte como un fenómeno emergente de la interacción entre biología, cognición y entorno social.


La primera transición: la cultura mimética

La primera gran transición cognitiva, según Donald, tuvo lugar con la aparición de Homo erectus, hace aproximadamente dos millones de años . En este momento, nuestros ancestros adquirieron la habilidad mimética: la capacidad de representar conocimiento a través de actos motores voluntarios, de manera deliberada y sistemática.

La mimesis es, en palabras de Donald, la "adaptación clave" que inició el viaje humano. No se trata de la imitación simple que también encontramos en otros primates, sino de una capacidad mucho más sofisticada: la de ensayar y refinar los movimientos del cuerpo, recordar esos ensayos y reproducirlos bajo demanda. Esta habilidad permitió a los primeros homínidos crear representaciones prelingüísticas de la realidad a través de gestos, rituales, danzas y artesanías.

La evidencia de esta capacidad se encuentra en la propia existencia de herramientas de piedra muy antiguas, que no pueden fabricarse sin la capacidad de ensayar sistemáticamente y sin la habilidad de imaginar una ejecución idealizada. Como señala Donald, los fabricantes de herramientas del Paleolítico aprendieron sus habilidades del mismo modo que los humanos modernos: imaginando sus ejecuciones en un contexto social y representándolas como escenarios dramáticos .

La cultura mimética tiene varias consecuencias cruciales. En primer lugar, modifica profundamente la mente de los primates, dando lugar a lo que Donald denomina "imaginación mimética": la capacidad de imaginar y modificar las propias acciones. En segundo lugar, transforma la cultura, creando un espacio de actuación compartido donde los roles pueden ser representados y ensayados. Esta cultura del rendimiento y el arte escénico sigue viva hoy en el deporte, el ritual y las artes performativas.


La segunda transición: la cultura mítica

La segunda transición cognitiva coincide con el desarrollo del lenguaje hablado, probablemente en las primeras poblaciones de Homo sapiens . La capacidad mimética sirvió como una preadaptación para este desarrollo, proporcionando la base para la comunicación simbólica.

Con el lenguaje, los humanos adquirieron la capacidad de representar la realidad a través de palabras, de construir relatos, de transmitir conocimientos complejos de generación en generación. Esta transición dio lugar a la cultura "mítica", caracterizada por la narración de historias, la creación de mitos y la construcción de cosmologías compartidas . La cultura mítica permitió a nuestra especie desarrollar sociedades prealfabetizadas complejas, que aún sobreviven en muchas partes del mundo.

La importancia del lenguaje en este proceso no puede subestimarse. Como señala Donald, las propiedades del cerebro, la cultura y la cognición han coevolucionado en un "bucle iterativo estrecho", donde el principal evento de la evolución humana ha ocurrido a nivel cognitivo, mediando el cambio en los niveles anatómico y cultural . El lenguaje, al permitir la transmisión de información simbólica, aceleró este proceso de coevolución.


La tercera transición: la cultura simbólica y tecnológica

La tercera y última transición, que Donald sitúa en el desarrollo de la escritura y los sistemas simbólicos externos (cuneiformes, jeroglíficos, alfabetos, matemáticas), supuso un cambio aún más radical que las anteriores . Con la invención de estos sistemas, la memoria biológica humana se convirtió en un vehículo inadecuado para almacenar y procesar el conocimiento colectivo .

Este es el momento en que nuestra especie comenzó a externalizar su memoria. Los símbolos externos —grabados en piedra, escritos en papiros, impresos en libros— se convirtieron en un nuevo tipo de "dispositivo de almacenamiento" que amplió exponencialmente la capacidad de la mente para retener y manipular información. La alfabetización simbólica, según Donald, consiste en el complejo conjunto de habilidades necesarias para interactuar con este sistema de memoria externa.

La consecuencia más profunda de esta transición es que la arquitectura de la memoria humana se ha visto alterada. Ya no necesitamos almacenar toda la información en nuestra memoria biológica; podemos delegar parte de esa carga en el sistema externo. Esto ha cambiado el modo en que el cerebro humano despliega sus recursos y, con ello, la forma de la cultura moderna.

Donald señala que esta transición está lejos de haber concluido. La tecnología informática intensifica los cambios iniciados por la escritura, ofreciendo capacidades aún más extensas para el almacenamiento y la recuperación externa de información . Su observación, formulada en 1991, es aún más relevante en la era de la inteligencia artificial y la realidad virtual.


La mente híbrida: vestigios y nuevos dispositivos

Una de las contribuciones más originales de Donald es su concepción de la mente moderna como una estructura híbrida. No hemos abandonado las capacidades de las etapas anteriores; las hemos integrado. La mente moderna contiene vestigios de la cognición mimética (en la danza, el ritual, el deporte), de la cognición lingüística (en el lenguaje y la narración) y de la cognición simbólica externa (en la lectura, la escritura y el pensamiento matemático).

Esta arquitectura híbrida se revela, según Donald, en la forma en que la mente se descompone tras una lesión cerebral. La independencia de los tres sistemas de representación —mimético, lingüístico y simbólico externo— sugiere que están sustentados por mecanismos neurales distintos, aunque interconectados.

Además, Donald señala que los humanos somos "criaturas que usan símbolos", pero que el símbolo no es un módulo mental fijo. Es el producto de una capacidad inventiva que se despliega en el ámbito social . Cada uno de los tres sistemas se basa en una capacidad inventiva, y los productos de esas capacidades —lenguajes, símbolos, gestos, rituales, imágenes— continúan siendo inventados y evaluados en el escenario social.


Paralelismos con el modelo S/Y/C: una lectura integradora

La teoría de Donald y el modelo S/Y/C del funcionamiento neuronal que constituye el núcleo de nuestra investigación (Mallo, 2023, 2025, 2026a, 2026b) convergen en varios puntos fundamentales, a pesar de partir de disciplinas y niveles de análisis diferentes. Mientras Donald rastrea la evolución cognitiva a través de las transiciones culturales, nuestra propuesta se centra en la función única del sistema nervioso. Esta convergencia no es casual: ambas perspectivas apuntan a una misma realidad, la de una especie que ha ido tejiendo su mente a lo largo del tiempo, integrando capas sucesivas de capacidades.

La dimensión S (Supervivencia) encuentra en la cultura mimética de Donald su correlato evolutivo. La capacidad de ensayar y refinar acciones, de imaginar ejecuciones ideales, es una herramienta de adaptación que mejora la capacidad de los grupos humanos para obtener recursos, procesar alimentos, fabricar herramientas y, en definitiva, sobrevivir. La cultura mimética, como señala Donald, es la plataforma sobre la que se ha construido toda la ejecución compleja, incluido el lenguaje . Las herramientas de piedra del Paleolítico, que no pueden fabricarse sin una capacidad de ensayo sistemático, son un testimonio de esta adaptación . La función neuronal que denominamos S no es una abstracción: es la base biológica que hizo posible el desarrollo de la capacidad mimética.

La dimensión Y (Symbolon) se ilumina con la segunda transición, la del lenguaje y la cultura mítica. El lenguaje es el symbolon por excelencia: un sistema de códigos compartidos que permite el reconocimiento mutuo, la transmisión de significado y la construcción de mundos simbólicos. La cultura mítica, con sus historias y cosmologías, es una manifestación de la capacidad humana de crear símbolos que trascienden la experiencia inmediata. El arte parietal del Paleolítico, que Donald sitúa en el contexto de la cultura mítica, es una expresión de esta capacidad simbólica. La Y no es, por tanto, un añadido cultural, sino la manifestación de una función neuronal que se activa y se desarrolla en el contexto de la cultura.

La dimensión C (Completitud) se manifiesta en la tercera transición, la de los sistemas simbólicos externos. La escritura, las matemáticas y los sistemas de almacenamiento externo son herramientas para cerrar formas, para crear totalidades coherentes a partir de fragmentos de información. La pulsión hacia la completitud, que en el arte se manifiesta como la necesidad de crear obras acabadas, se extiende aquí a todo el ámbito del conocimiento. Los sistemas simbólicos externos nos permiten construir totalidades cognitivas que trascienden las capacidades de la memoria biológica individual. La C es, en este sentido, el impulso que nos lleva a completar y a cerrar los circuitos de significado, ya sea en una obra de arte o en un sistema de conocimiento.

Donald no emplea nuestro lenguaje, pero su descripción de las tres transiciones cognitivas apunta en la misma dirección. Lo que él describe como la emergencia de nuevas capacidades de representación —mimética, lingüística y simbólica externa— es la manifestación, en el plano de la cultura, de una función neuronal única que se despliega en tres dimensiones concatenadas. La mente híbrida que Donald describe es el resultado de esta concatenación, en la que cada nueva capa no sustituye a la anterior, sino que la integra y la transforma. Este es, precisamente, el principio que subyace a la Ley de coherencia biológica S/Y/C.


Consideraciones finales: la evolución continua de la mente

El libro de Merlin Donald nos recuerda que la evolución de la mente humana no es un proceso concluido. Como señala en su Précis de 1993, "la evolución cognitiva no está aún completa: la externalización de la memoria ha alterado la arquitectura real de la memoria dentro de la cual los humanos piensan" . Estamos en medio de una tercera transición que aún no ha revelado todas sus consecuencias.

La pregunta que Donald plantea al final de su obra —y que nosotros podemos hacer nuestra— es cómo esta externalización de la memoria está cambiando el modo en que los humanos pensamos y, con ello, la forma de nuestra cultura. La tecnología digital, la inteligencia artificial y los dispositivos de almacenamiento externo son los herederos directos de los primeros sistemas simbólicos. La mente moderna, híbrida y en constante evolución, sigue siendo un proyecto abierto.

Como señala Donald, cuando estudiamos a los adultos alfabetizados que viven en sociedades tecnológicamente avanzadas, estamos observando un subtipo que no es más típico de toda la especie humana que, por ejemplo, los miembros de un grupo de cazadores-recolectores . Nuestra ciencia, nuestra filosofía y nuestro arte estarían conformados de manera diferente si se hubieran basado en otro tipo de cultura. Comprender esta diversidad cognitiva, y cómo se ha ido configurando a lo largo de las tres grandes transiciones, es esencial para entender quiénes somos y hacia dónde vamos.


Referencias bibliográficas

Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Harvard University Press.

Donald, M. (1993). Précis of Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16(4), 737–748. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00032647

Mallo, B. (2023). La construcción neuro-simbólica. Una aproximación al funcionamiento del cerebro desde una perspectiva multidisciplinar [Tesis doctoral, Universidad del País Vasco - Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea]. Repositorio ADDI. http://hdl.handle.net/10810/62701

Mallo, B. (2025). Arte y biología: Una aproximación neurofilosófica al origen de la experiencia estética. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0E8Y5WZMK

Mallo, B. (2025). Art and biology: A neurophilosophical approach to the origin of aesthetic experience. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0E8Y6C2XN

Mallo, B. (2026a). De la filosofía quirúrgica a la ley de coherencia biológica S/Y/C: Hacia una investigación sobre el origen del arte en la especie Homo. https://isbn.bibna.gub.uy/catalogo.php?mode=detalle&nt=57196

Mallo, B. (2026a). De la filosofía quirúrgica a la ley de coherencia biológica S/Y/C: Hacia una investigación sobre el origen del arte en la especie Homo [Versión Kindle]. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0GYGTJD5C

Mallo, B. (2026b). From surgical philosophy to the law of biological coherence S/Y/C: Toward a study of the origin of art in the Homo lineage. https://isbn.bibna.gub.uy/catalogo.php?mode=detalle&nt=57197


Autor / Author


Bernabé Mallo
 Doctor en Filosofía – Universidad del País Vasco / Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (UPV/EHU)
 Investigador independiente en neurofilosofía, evolución humana y origen del arte.
 

Bernabé Mallo
 PhD in Philosophy – University of the Basque Country / Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (UPV/EHU)
 Independent researcher in neurophilosophy, human evolution, and the origin of art.

Enlaces / Links


Página de autor Amazon / Amazon Author Page: https://www.amazon.com/author/bernabemallo
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9002-9728
Plataforma EHUenRed / Link EHUenRed:  https://www.ehu.eus/es/web/masterrak-eta-graduondokoak/red-latinoamericana-de-posgrados
Canal YouTube / Channel YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@neuroideas815
Canal YouTube / Channel YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBsf6OZ482NjST6QA-hvYtQ
Publicaciones y proyectos en desarrollo / Publications and projects: 
https://www.amazon.com/author/bernabemallo
https://ehuenred.theglocal.network/ideas/el-origen-del-arte-en-el-cerebro-de-makapansgat-al-moma-del-primate-al-sapiens

 


viernes, 7 de agosto de 2026

The Human Journey: From the Makapansgat Pebble to the Far Reaches of the Cosmos

 

Bernabé Mallo

Doctor en Filosofía por la Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU)
Investigador en neurofilosofía, evolución humana y origen del arte. / PhD in Philosophy – University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)
Researcher in neurophilosophy, human evolution, and the origins of art.

A reflection on the origin of art and the continuity of the species through the lens of Clottes, Menninghaus, and Henshilwood


Introduction: a simple and complex question

What connects an australopithecine who collected a pebble shaped like a face, a Palaeolithic artist who ventured into the depths of a cave to paint a bison, an Egyptian educator who protected young people with amulets and teachings, and a contemporary astronaut who gazes at Earth from space? The answer, perhaps, is simpler than it seems: they are all children of the same species, bearers of the same symbolic heritage, driven by the same urge toward survival, meaning, and wholeness.

Let us begin with a lived experience. The Guaraní peoples of Paraguay, like so many other indigenous cultures, demonstrate an extraordinary knowledge of their natural environment and its possibilities for survival. They know the plants, the animals, the cycles, the dangers. They know how to move, how to protect themselves, how to obtain resources. This knowledge is not an exception: it is the norm in every human culture that has depended directly on its environment. The educational systems of ancient Egypt, for their part, show us another aspect of this same capacity: childhood was protected through advanced teachings and amulets that safeguarded children from environmental threats . Survival was not only physical, but also symbolic.

If knowledge of the environment generates confidence, and confidence drives exploration, then the history of our species is the history of a continuous expansion. We know our environment, we feel safe, and we venture to investigate other lands, other cultures, other worlds. Thus it was in the past, and thus it continues today. The question we pose is, therefore, a question about the continuity of the human: what happened that led an australopithecine to carry a stone like the Makapansgat pebble to its home? What happened that led the artists of Altamira or Lascaux to paint animals in difficult-to-access areas, almost hidden? What happened that led the Egyptians to develop such advanced educational systems? And what is happening today with space travellers?


The enigma of Makapansgat: the first symbolic gesture

The Makapansgat pebble, a reddish jasper stone weighing about 260 grams, was found in 1925 in a cave in South Africa, several kilometres from its nearest natural source . Its natural marks and wear give it a striking resemblance to a human face. It was neither carved nor modified by human hands. It was collected and transported. Why?

The answer, though uncertain, is fascinating. Someone —an australopithecine, perhaps, or some other early hominin— saw in that stone something more than a stone. They saw a face. And they did not only see it: they valued it enough to carry it with them, to make it part of their home, to keep it in an inhabited space .

This seemingly trivial gesture is the earliest evidence of a capacity that defines us as a species: the capacity to recognise symbols, to see beyond immediate reality, to attribute meaning to objects that have no practical utility. The Makapansgat pebble was not used for cutting, striking, or protecting. It served to be looked at. And in looking at it, the one who found it saw themselves reflected in it.

The discoveries at Blombos Cave, with their engraved ochre pieces over 70,000 years old, confirm that this symbolic capacity was not an isolated accident . The abstract geometric patterns engraved on these pieces are not representations of animals or people. They are symbols: arbitrary conventions created to express shared concepts, whose meaning has been lost but whose symbolic intention is indisputable . As Christopher Henshilwood notes, "these finds demonstrate that ochre use in the MSA was not exclusively utilitarian and, arguably, the transmission and sharing of the meaning of the engravings relied on fully syntactical language" .


Cave art: why hide beauty?

If the Blombos engravings show us the capacity to create symbols, the paintings of Altamira and Lascaux show us the capacity to hide them. The animals represented in these caves are not at the entrances, nor in the illuminated areas. They are in the depths, in narrow galleries, in difficult-to-access places . Why?

Jean Clottes, in his article on the interpretation of prehistoric art, reviews the main theories that have attempted to answer this question . The theory of "art for art's sake", which saw in these works mere entertainment or ornamentation, was abandoned precisely because it could not explain why they were produced in such remote and dark places. The theory of sympathetic magic, which interpreted them as rituals to ensure hunting success, also failed to account for all the evidence: the animals represented were not always the most hunted, and wounded or pierced figures are surprisingly rare .

The most recent hypothesis, defended by Clottes together with David Lewis-Williams, is that of Palaeolithic shamanism . According to this interpretation, the deep caves were perceived as the realm of spirits, as gateways to the supernatural world. Entering them was therefore a form of shamanic journey, a search for contact with the forces that governed the world. The paintings and engravings would be the materialisation of the visions obtained during trance, and the natural reliefs of the walls —which could evoke animal forms— would be deliberately used to "free" the spirits from the rock .

This hypothesis offers an answer to the questions we posed. The animals represented were not the most consumed because they were not hunting objects, but auxiliary spirits: beings encountered by the shaman in their visions, whose power they sought to channel. The representation in difficult-to-access areas was not a whim, but a necessity: the journey to the underground world was a metaphor for the journey to the spirit world, and the difficulty of access was part of the ritual. The caves were not hiding places, but sanctuaries: places where the community could enter into contact with the sacred.


The restless traveller: from Altamira to outer space

If Palaeolithic art was a form of spiritual journey, our species has never ceased to travel. The hominins who collected the Makapansgat pebble, the artists who painted in the depths of the caves, the educators who protected the children of ancient Egypt, and the astronauts who today explore space share a common characteristic: dissatisfaction with the present, the need to go further, to explore, to know, to transcend.

This travelling drive is not a cultural accident. It is a consequence of our symbolic capacity, of our capacity to symbolise what is not present and to desire what does not yet exist. The space traveller is no different from the Palaeolithic hunter who ventured into a dark cave, nor the Polynesian navigator who crossed the Pacific in canoes, nor the explorer who mapped unknown continents. They are all bearers of the same heritage: the capacity to imagine a beyond and to act to reach it.

The technology that enables these journeys —from the Blombos bone tools to space rockets— is also a manifestation of the same symbolic capacity . The Blombos bone tools, about 70,000 years old, are not merely useful objects. They are products of a sequence of deliberate technical choices, requiring planning, knowledge, and transmission of skills . They are, in this sense, the Palaeolithic equivalent of a spacecraft: the result of a mind that thinks long-term, anticipates needs, and designs solutions for future problems.


Towards a synthesis: art as testimony to human continuity

Winfried Menninghaus, in his book Aesthetics after Darwin, proposes a "cooptation" model to explain the multiple origins of the human arts . According to this model, art emerged when three ancient and largely independent adaptations —sensory biases linked to sexual selection, play behaviour, and technology— came together and were transformed by human capacities for symbolic cognition and language . Art, from this perspective, is not a specific adaptation for a concrete function, but a new behavioural variant that emerged from the confluence of several evolutionary factors .

This model fits perfectly with the continuity we have traced from Makapansgat to space exploration. The capacity to recognise a face in a stone (sensory bias), the curiosity to explore the unknown (play behaviour), and the ability to make tools that allow us to reach further (technology) combined with symbolic capacity to create art, to travel, to educate, to transcend.

The question we posed at the beginning —what connects the australopithecine, the Palaeolithic artist, the Egyptian educator, and the astronaut— thus finds an answer: they are all manifestations of the same unique neuronal function, which we have called S/Y/C:

  • S (Survival): the need to know the environment, to protect oneself, to ensure the continuity of life. The Guaraní who knows the jungle, the Egyptian who protects their children, the astronaut who keeps their spacecraft functioning: they are all attending to survival.

  • Y (Symbolon): the capacity to create and share symbols, to attribute meaning to objects and actions. The australopithecine who sees a face in a stone, the artist who paints a bison in a cave, the Egyptian who makes an amulet, the astronaut who plants a flag on the Moon: they are all creating symbolon.

  • C (Wholeness): the drive toward totality, the need to close a cycle, to achieve a goal. The traveller who enters the cave, the explorer who crosses the ocean, the astronaut who reaches space: they are all seeking wholeness, the sensation of having arrived somewhere.


Final considerations: the species that never stops travelling

The history of our species is the history of a continuous journey. It began with a faltering step out of Africa, continued with the exploration of all continents, and today takes us to the far reaches of the solar system. But the journey is not only physical. It is also spiritual, symbolic, interior. Art, religion, philosophy, science, and technology are the different forms this journey has taken.

The Makapansgat pebble, the paintings of Altamira, the Blombos bone tools, the Egyptian amulets, and today's spacecraft are all milestones on the same path: the path of a species that is not satisfied with what it has, that always wants to go further, that never stops asking what lies on the other side.

And on this path, what we carry with us is always the same: our capacity to symbolise, to create meaning, to seek wholeness. That is what makes us human. And that is what, probably, will continue to accompany us as the journey continues.


References

Clottes, J. (2003). De « l'art pour l'art » au chamanisme : l'interprétation de l'art préhistorique. La revue pour l'histoire du CNRS, (8). https://doi.org/10.4000/histoire-cnrs.553

Henshilwood, C. S., d'Errico, F., Marean, C. W., Milo, R. G., & Yates, R. (2001). An early bone tool industry from the Middle Stone Age at Blombos Cave, South Africa: Implications for the origins of modern human behaviour, symbolism and language. Journal of Human Evolution, 41(6), 631–678. https://doi.org/10.1006/jhev.2001.0515

Henshilwood, C. S., d'Errico, F., Yates, R., Jacobs, Z., Tribolo, C., Duller, G. A. T., Mercier, N., Sealy, J. C., Valladas, H., Watts, I., & Wintle, A. G. (2002). Emergence of modern human behavior: Middle Stone Age engravings from South Africa. Science, 295(5558), 1278–1280. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1067575

Henshilwood, C. S., d'Errico, F., & Watts, I. (2009). Engraved ochres from the Middle Stone Age levels at Blombos Cave, South Africa. Journal of Human Evolution, 57(1), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.02.006

Mallo, B. (2023). La construcción neuro-simbólica. Una aproximación al funcionamiento del cerebro desde una perspectiva multidisciplinar [Doctoral thesis, University of the Basque Country - Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea]. ADDI Repository. http://hdl.handle.net/10810/62701

Mallo, B. (2025). Arte y biología: Una aproximación neurofilosófica al origen de la experiencia estética. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0E8Y5WZMK

Mallo, B. (2025). Art and biology: A neurophilosophical approach to the origin of aesthetic experience. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0E8Y6C2XN

Mallo, B. (2026a). De la filosofía quirúrgica a la ley de coherencia biológica S/Y/C: Hacia una investigación sobre el origen del arte en la especie Homo. https://isbn.bibna.gub.uy/catalogo.php?mode=detalle&nt=57196

Mallo, B. (2026a). De la filosofía quirúrgica a la ley de coherencia biológica S/Y/C: Hacia una investigación sobre el origen del arte en la especie Homo [Kindle edition]. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0GYGTJD5C

Mallo, B. (2026b). From surgical philosophy to the law of biological coherence S/Y/C: Toward a study of the origin of art in the Homo lineage. https://isbn.bibna.gub.uy/catalogo.php?mode=detalle&nt=57197

Menninghaus, W. (2019). Aesthetics after Darwin: The multiple origins and functions of the arts (A. Berlina, Trans.). Academic Studies Press. (Original work published 2011)


Autor / Author


Bernabé Mallo
 Doctor en Filosofía – Universidad del País Vasco / Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (UPV/EHU)
 Investigador independiente en neurofilosofía, evolución humana y origen del arte.
 

Bernabé Mallo
 PhD in Philosophy – University of the Basque Country / Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (UPV/EHU)
 Independent researcher in neurophilosophy, human evolution, and the origin of art.

Enlaces / Links


Página de autor Amazon / Amazon Author Page: https://www.amazon.com/author/bernabemallo
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9002-9728
Plataforma EHUenRed / Link EHUenRed:  https://www.ehu.eus/es/web/masterrak-eta-graduondokoak/red-latinoamericana-de-posgrados
Canal YouTube / Channel YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@neuroideas815
Canal YouTube / Channel YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBsf6OZ482NjST6QA-hvYtQ
Publicaciones y proyectos en desarrollo / Publications and projects: 
https://www.amazon.com/author/bernabemallo
https://ehuenred.theglocal.network/ideas/el-origen-del-arte-en-el-cerebro-de-makapansgat-al-moma-del-primate-al-sapiens

 


 

El viaje humano: de la piedra de Makapansgat a los confines del cosmos

Bernabé Mallo

Doctor en Filosofía por la Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU)
Investigador en neurofilosofía, evolución humana y origen del arte. / PhD in Philosophy – University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)
Researcher in neurophilosophy, human evolution, and the origins of art.

Una reflexión sobre el origen del arte y la continuidad de la especie a la luz de Clottes, Menninghaus y Henshilwood


Introducción: una pregunta simple y compleja

¿Qué une a un australopiteco que recolecta una piedra con forma de rostro, a un artista paleolítico que se adentra en las profundidades de una cueva para pintar un bisonte, a un educador del antiguo Egipto que protege a los jóvenes con amuletos y enseñanzas, y a un astronauta contemporáneo que contempla la Tierra desde el espacio? La respuesta, quizás, es más simple de lo que parece: todos ellos son hijos de una misma especie, portadores de una misma herencia simbólica, movidos por una misma pulsión hacia la supervivencia, el significado y la totalidad.

Partamos de una experiencia vivida. Los pueblos guaraníes del Paraguay, como tantas otras culturas indígenas, demuestran un conocimiento extraordinario de su entorno natural y de sus posibilidades de supervivencia. Conocen las plantas, los animales, los ciclos, los peligros. Saben cómo moverse, cómo protegerse, cómo obtener recursos. Este conocimiento no es una excepción: es la norma en toda cultura humana que ha dependido directamente de su entorno. Los sistemas educativos del antiguo Egipto, por su parte, nos muestran otro aspecto de esta misma capacidad: la infancia era protegida mediante enseñanzas avanzadas y amuletos que las resguardaban de las amenazas del entorno . La supervivencia no era solo física, sino también simbólica.

Si el conocimiento del entorno genera confianza, y la confianza impulsa la exploración, entonces la historia de nuestra especie es la historia de una expansión continua. Conocemos nuestro entorno, nos sentimos seguros, y nos aventuramos a investigar otras tierras, otras culturas, otros mundos. Así fue en el pasado, y así sigue siendo hoy. La pregunta que nos planteamos es, por tanto, una pregunta sobre la continuidad de lo humano: ¿qué ocurrió para que un australopiteco llevara una piedra como Makapansgat hasta su hogar? ¿Qué ocurrió para que los artistas de Altamira o Lascaux pintaran animales en zonas de difícil acceso, casi escondidos? ¿Qué ocurrió para que los egipcios desarrollaran sistemas educativos tan avanzados? ¿Y qué ocurre hoy con los viajeros del espacio?


El enigma de Makapansgat: el primer gesto simbólico

El guijarro de Makapansgat, una piedra de jaspe rojizo de unos 260 gramos, fue encontrado en 1925 en una cueva de Sudáfrica, a varios kilómetros de su fuente natural más cercana . Sus marcas y desgastes naturales le dan un sorprendente parecido a un rostro humano. No fue tallado ni modificado por mano humana. Fue recolectado y transportado. ¿Por qué?

La respuesta, aunque incierta, es fascinante. Alguien —un australopiteco, quizás, o algún otro homínido temprano— vio en esa piedra algo más que una piedra. Vio un rostro. Y no solo lo vio: lo valoró lo suficiente como para llevarlo consigo, para hacerlo parte de su hogar, para conservarlo en un espacio habitado.

Este gesto, aparentemente trivial, es la primera evidencia de una capacidad que nos define como especie: la capacidad de reconocer símbolos, de ver más allá de la realidad inmediata, de atribuir significado a objetos que no tienen utilidad práctica. La piedra de Makapansgat no servía para cortar, ni para golpear, ni para protegerse. Servía para mirar. Y al mirarla, quien la encontró se veía a sí mismo reflejado en ella.

Los descubrimientos de Blombos Cave, con sus ocre grabados de más de 70.000 años de antigüedad, confirman que esta capacidad simbólica no fue un accidente aislado . Los patrones geométricos abstractos grabados en esas piezas no son representaciones de animales o personas. Son símbolos: convenciones arbitrarias creadas para expresar conceptos compartidos, cuyo significado se ha perdido pero cuya intención simbólica es indiscutible . Como señala Christopher Henshilwood, "estos hallazgos demuestran que el uso del ocre en el Middle Stone Age no era exclusivamente utilitario y, posiblemente, la transmisión y el intercambio del significado de los grabados dependía de un lenguaje plenamente sintáctico" .


El arte de las cuevas: ¿por qué esconder la belleza?

Si los grabados de Blombos nos muestran la capacidad de crear símbolos, las pinturas de Altamira y Lascaux nos muestran la capacidad de esconderlos. Los animales representados en estas cuevas no están en las entradas, ni en las zonas iluminadas. Están en las profundidades, en galerías estrechas, en lugares de difícil acceso . ¿Por qué?

Jean Clottes, en su artículo sobre la interpretación del arte prehistórico, revisa las principales teorías que han intentado responder a esta pregunta. La teoría del "arte por el arte", que veía en estas obras un mero entretenimiento o adorno, fue abandonada precisamente porque no podía explicar por qué se realizaban en lugares tan remotos y oscuros. La teoría de la magia simpática, que las interpretaba como rituales para asegurar el éxito en la caza, tampoco lograba dar cuenta de todas las evidencias: los animales representados no eran siempre los más cazados, y las figuras heridas o acribilladas son sorprendentemente raras.

La hipótesis más reciente, defendida por Clottes junto a David Lewis-Williams, es la del chamanismo paleolítico. Según esta interpretación, las cuevas profundas eran percibidas como el reino de los espíritus, como puertas al mundo sobrenatural. Adentrarse en ellas era, por tanto, una forma de viaje chamánico, una búsqueda de contacto con las fuerzas que regían el mundo. Las pinturas y grabados serían la materialización de las visiones obtenidas durante el trance, y los relieves naturales de las paredes —que podían evocar formas animales— serían utilizados deliberadamente para "liberar" a los espíritus de la roca .

Esta hipótesis ofrece una respuesta a las preguntas que nos planteábamos. Los animales representados no eran los más consumidos porque no eran objetos de caza, sino espíritus auxiliares: seres con los que el chamán se encontraba en sus visiones, y cuyo poder buscaba canalizar. La representación en zonas de difícil acceso no era un capricho, sino una necesidad: el viaje al mundo subterráneo era una metáfora del viaje al mundo de los espíritus, y la dificultad del acceso formaba parte del ritual. Las cuevas no eran escondites, sino santuarios: lugares donde la comunidad podía entrar en contacto con lo sagrado.


El viajero incansable: de Altamira al espacio exterior

Si el arte paleolítico era una forma de viaje espiritual, nuestra especie nunca ha dejado de viajar. Los homínidos que recolectaron la piedra de Makapansgat, los artistas que pintaron en las profundidades de las cuevas, los educadores que protegieron a los niños del antiguo Egipto, y los astronautas que hoy exploran el espacio comparten una misma característica: la insatisfacción con el presente, la necesidad de ir más allá, de explorar, de conocer, de trascender.

Esta pulsión viajera no es un accidente cultural. Es una consecuencia de nuestra capacidad simbólica, de nuestra capacidad de simbolizar lo que no está presente y de desear lo que aún no existe. El viajero espacial no es diferente del cazador paleolítico que se adentraba en una cueva oscura, ni del navegante polinesio que cruzaba el Pacífico en canoas, ni del explorador que cartografiaba continentes desconocidos. Todos ellos son portadores de la misma herencia: la capacidad de imaginar un más allá y de actuar para alcanzarlo.

La tecnología que posibilita estos viajes —desde las herramientas de hueso de Blombos hasta los cohetes espaciales— es también una manifestación de la misma capacidad simbólica . Las herramientas de hueso de Blombos, de unos 70.000 años de antigüedad, no son solo objetos útiles. Son productos de una secuencia de elecciones técnicas deliberadas, que requieren planificación, conocimiento y transmisión de saberes . Son, en este sentido, el equivalente paleolítico de una nave espacial: el resultado de una mente que piensa a largo plazo, que anticipa necesidades y que diseña soluciones para problemas futuros.


Hacia una síntesis: el arte como testimonio de la continuidad humana

Winfried Menninghaus, en su libro Aesthetics after Darwin, propone un modelo de "cooptación" para explicar el origen múltiple de las artes humanas . Según este modelo, el arte surgió cuando tres adaptaciones antiguas y en gran medida independientes —los sesgos sensoriales vinculados a la selección sexual, el comportamiento de juego y la tecnología— se unieron y fueron transformadas por las capacidades humanas de cognición simbólica y lenguaje. El arte, desde esta perspectiva, no es una adaptación específica para una función concreta, sino una nueva variante de comportamiento que emergió de la confluencia de varios factores evolutivos.

Este modelo se ajusta perfectamente a la continuidad que hemos trazado desde Makapansgat hasta la exploración espacial. La capacidad de reconocer un rostro en una piedra (sesgo sensorial), la curiosidad por explorar lo desconocido (comportamiento de juego), y la habilidad para fabricar herramientas que nos permitan llegar más lejos (tecnología) se combinaron con la capacidad simbólica para crear arte, para viajar, para educar, para trascender.

La pregunta que nos planteábamos al principio —qué une al australopiteco, al artista paleolítico, al educador egipcio y al astronauta— encuentra así una respuesta: todos ellos son manifestaciones de una misma función neuronal única, que hemos denominado S/Y/C:

  • S (Supervivencia): la necesidad de conocer el entorno, de protegerse, de asegurar la continuidad de la vida. El guaraní que conoce la selva, el egipcio que protege a sus hijos, el astronauta que mantiene su nave en funcionamiento: todos ellos están atendiendo a la supervivencia.

  • Y (Symbolon): la capacidad de crear y compartir símbolos, de atribuir significado a objetos y acciones. El australopiteco que ve un rostro en una piedra, el artista que pinta un bisonte en una cueva, el egipcio que fabrica un amuleto, el astronauta que planta una bandera en la Luna: todos ellos están creando symbolon.

  • C (Completitud): la pulsión hacia la totalidad, la necesidad de cerrar un ciclo, de alcanzar una meta. El viajero que se adentra en la cueva, el explorador que cruza el océano, el astronauta que llega al espacio: todos ellos están buscando la completitud, la sensación de haber llegado a algún lugar.


Consideraciones finales: la especie que no deja de viajar

La historia de nuestra especie es la historia de un viaje continuo. Comenzó con un paso vacilante fuera de África, continuó con la exploración de todos los continentes, y hoy nos lleva a los confines del sistema solar. Pero el viaje no es solo físico. También es espiritual, simbólico, interior. El arte, la religión, la filosofía, la ciencia y la tecnología son las diferentes formas que ha adoptado ese viaje.

La piedra de Makapansgat, las pinturas de Altamira, las herramientas de hueso de Blombos, los amuletos egipcios, y las naves espaciales actuales son todos hitos de un mismo camino: el camino de una especie que no se conforma con lo que tiene, que siempre quiere ir más allá, que nunca deja de preguntarse qué hay al otro lado.

Y en ese camino, lo que llevamos con nosotros es siempre lo mismo: nuestra capacidad de simbolizar, de crear significado, de buscar la totalidad. Eso es lo que nos hace humanos. Y eso es lo que, probablemente, seguirá acompañándonos mientras el viaje continúe.


Referencias bibliográficas

Clottes, J. (2003). De « l'art pour l'art » au chamanisme : l'interprétation de l'art préhistorique. La revue pour l'histoire du CNRS, (8). https://doi.org/10.4000/histoire-cnrs.553

Henshilwood, C. S., d'Errico, F., Marean, C. W., Milo, R. G., & Yates, R. (2001). An early bone tool industry from the Middle Stone Age at Blombos Cave, South Africa: Implications for the origins of modern human behaviour, symbolism and language. Journal of Human Evolution, 41(6), 631–678. https://doi.org/10.1006/jhev.2001.0515

Henshilwood, C. S., d'Errico, F., Yates, R., Jacobs, Z., Tribolo, C., Duller, G. A. T., Mercier, N., Sealy, J. C., Valladas, H., Watts, I., & Wintle, A. G. (2002). Emergence of modern human behavior: Middle Stone Age engravings from South Africa. Science, 295(5558), 1278–1280. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1067575

Henshilwood, C. S., d'Errico, F., & Watts, I. (2009). Engraved ochres from the Middle Stone Age levels at Blombos Cave, South Africa. Journal of Human Evolution, 57(1), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.02.006

Mallo, B. (2023). La construcción neuro-simbólica. Una aproximación al funcionamiento del cerebro desde una perspectiva multidisciplinar [Tesis doctoral, Universidad del País Vasco - Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea]. Repositorio ADDI. http://hdl.handle.net/10810/62701

Mallo, B. (2025). Arte y biología: Una aproximación neurofilosófica al origen de la experiencia estética. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0E8Y5WZMK

Mallo, B. (2025). Art and biology: A neurophilosophical approach to the origin of aesthetic experience. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0E8Y6C2XN

Mallo, B. (2026a). De la filosofía quirúrgica a la ley de coherencia biológica S/Y/C: Hacia una investigación sobre el origen del arte en la especie Homo. https://isbn.bibna.gub.uy/catalogo.php?mode=detalle&nt=57196

Mallo, B. (2026a). De la filosofía quirúrgica a la ley de coherencia biológica S/Y/C: Hacia una investigación sobre el origen del arte en la especie Homo [Versión Kindle]. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0GYGTJD5C

Mallo, B. (2026b). From surgical philosophy to the law of biological coherence S/Y/C: Toward a study of the origin of art in the Homo lineage. https://isbn.bibna.gub.uy/catalogo.php?mode=detalle&nt=57197

Menninghaus, W. (2019). Aesthetics after Darwin: The multiple origins and functions of the arts (A. Berlina, Trad.). Academic Studies Press. (Obra original publicada en 2011)


Autor / Author


Bernabé Mallo
 Doctor en Filosofía – Universidad del País Vasco / Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (UPV/EHU)
 Investigador independiente en neurofilosofía, evolución humana y origen del arte.
 

Bernabé Mallo
 PhD in Philosophy – University of the Basque Country / Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (UPV/EHU)
 Independent researcher in neurophilosophy, human evolution, and the origin of art.

Enlaces / Links


Página de autor Amazon / Amazon Author Page: https://www.amazon.com/author/bernabemallo
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9002-9728
Plataforma EHUenRed / Link EHUenRed:  https://www.ehu.eus/es/web/masterrak-eta-graduondokoak/red-latinoamericana-de-posgrados
Canal YouTube / Channel YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@neuroideas815
Canal YouTube / Channel YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBsf6OZ482NjST6QA-hvYtQ
Publicaciones y proyectos en desarrollo / Publications and projects: 
https://www.amazon.com/author/bernabemallo
https://ehuenred.theglocal.network/ideas/el-origen-del-arte-en-el-cerebro-de-makapansgat-al-moma-del-primate-al-sapiens

 

 

 

domingo, 2 de agosto de 2026

From Magic to Trance: The Long Journey Towards Interpreting Palaeolithic Art

 

Bernabé Mallo

Doctor en Filosofía por la Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU)
Investigador en neurofilosofía, evolución humana y origen del arte. / PhD in Philosophy – University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)
Researcher in neurophilosophy, human evolution, and the origins of art.

 

A review of Jean Clottes' article (2003): From «Art for Art's Sake» to Shamanism: The Interpretation of Prehistoric Art


Introduction: the enigma of the deep caves

Why did our Palaeolithic ancestors venture into the depths of the earth, into dark and narrow galleries, to paint and engrave animals that could barely be seen? What drove them to leave their mark in places where torchlight barely illuminated the rock, far from settlements and from everyday view? The question of the meaning of prehistoric art has fascinated researchers for over a century, and the answers have been as varied as the currents of thought that generated them.

Jean Clottes, one of the world's most distinguished prehistorians, former General Curator of Heritage at the French Ministry of Culture and scientific director of the Chauvet cave studies, published in 2003 an article in La revue pour l'histoire du CNRS that offers a masterful overview of the history of interpretations of Palaeolithic art . In it, Clottes not only reviews the main theories that have succeeded one another since the 19th century —art for art's sake, totemism, sympathetic magic, structuralism— but also presents the hypothesis that he himself has defended together with South African anthropologist David Lewis-Williams: shamanism as an explanatory framework for understanding cave art .

The article, despite its brevity, condenses decades of reflection and fieldwork. Clottes warns us from the outset of the difficulties of interpreting a "fossil" art, whose ultimate meaning is inaccessible to us . However, far from the pessimism of those who recommend abandoning all research on meaning, Clottes argues that it is possible to reach a certain degree of understanding using three types of arguments: those that come from the art itself, those that derive from its archaeological context, and those that rely on ethnological comparisons with recent traditional societies that practise or practised rock art .


The insufficiency of the modern gaze: "art for art's sake" and its limits

The first attempt to explain Palaeolithic art, following the discovery of decorated objects in the second half of the 19th century, was the theory of "art for art's sake" . Engravings and sculptures would have no other purpose than to adorn weapons and tools, for the sheer pleasure of doing so. This interpretation, however, reflected more the conceptions of the time —the militant anti-clericalism of some prehistorians and the idea of the "noble savage" living in a world of abundance— than a rigorous approach to the Palaeolithic phenomenon.

Clottes points out that this theory was abandoned because it could not account for the paintings and engravings located in the deep galleries, far from settlements and from view . If art had been merely entertainment or ornamentation, why would it have been produced in such inaccessible and dark places? The theory of "art for art's sake" also clashed with ethnological evidence: in traditional societies, the concept of "art" as a disinterested and autonomous activity was absent. Images were produced within the framework of the community and for a specific purpose, not for the pleasure of the author or the satisfaction of personal desires.


Magic and totemism: art as an instrument of survival

At the end of the 19th century and during the first half of the 20th, the dominant interpretation was sympathetic magic, developed by Salomon Reinach and popularised by Abbé Breuil and Count Bégouën . This theory was based on the belief that there was a direct relationship between the image and the subject represented: by acting on the image, one acted on the real animal. Magical practices would have had three main purposes: to ensure success in hunting, to promote the fertility of useful species, and to destroy dangerous animals .

The hunting magic hypothesis seemed to explain well the presence of wounded animals or those pierced by arrows, as well as the location of figures in remote and often difficult-to-access places. However, Clottes points out the contradictions of this theory. Animals marked with wounds are rare, explicit mating scenes are scarce, and the remains of hunted animals in settlements do not correspond to the most represented species on cave walls . As Claude Lévi-Strauss noted, some animals were "good to eat" and others "good to think with", forming part of a "bestiary" linked to socio-religious traditions . Moreover, sympathetic magic could not explain the presence of negative hands, caricatured human figures, or, above all, composite creatures, those monstrous beings that do not exist in nature and whose destruction or multiplication would make no sense.

Totemism, which proposes a privileged relationship between a human group and an animal or plant species that characterises and venerates it, was another brief attempt . However, it was criticised because some animals appeared to be struck by weapons, which was incompatible with the respect due to the totem, and because the mixtures of species in each cave did not correspond to the homogeneity that might be expected from clan emblems .


Structuralism: art as a binary system

The second half of the 20th century was marked by structuralism, whose main exponents in the study of Palaeolithic art were Annette Laming-Emperaire and André Leroi-Gourhan . In contrast to ethnological comparativism, the structuralists proposed a return to the cave and to the works, seeking in their distribution and associations the principles of a symbolic grammar.

Leroi-Gourhan, through statistical analyses, concluded that bison and horses formed the basis of the bestiary and preferentially occupied the central panels, while complementary animals (ibex, deer) occupied a secondary place and formidable animals (lions, bears) were relegated to the depths. Geometric signs would participate in this symbolism in a binary system where animals and signs would have a masculine or feminine value, opposite and complementary .

Clottes points out that, despite their failure as attempts at global interpretation, structuralist theories have profoundly influenced research. The importance of the cave in choices and meanings can no longer be questioned; the distribution of drawings according to relief and topography has become a fundamental element of modern studies . However, criticisms have also been forceful: the sexual typology of animals and signs was considered too subjective, and the schemes proposed by Leroi-Gourhan proved inapplicable to many caves discovered subsequently .


Shamanism: the hypothesis that integrates art, mind and landscape

The most recent hypothesis, and the one that Clottes defends together with Lewis-Williams, is that of Palaeolithic shamanism . This interpretation is based on the idea that shamanic religions, which cover the entire north of the planet and part of the Americas, are the religions par excellence of hunter-gatherer peoples . Their antiquity and cosmological character make them an appropriate framework for understanding Palaeolithic art.

Shamanism is characterised by a conception of a complex cosmos where at least two worlds coexist, and by the belief that some people can, through trance, enter into contact with the spirit world to heal the sick, maintain natural balance, or ensure success in hunting . The shaman acts as a mediator between the real world and that of the spirits, often with the help of animal auxiliaries.

Clottes and Lewis-Williams establish an analogy between the underground journey to the depths of the caves and the shamanic journey to the spirit world . The Palaeolithic people, by venturing into the depths, were deliberately venturing into the supernatural world. The underground environment, with its darkness and silence, favoured the appearance of altered states of consciousness and hallucinations . The parietal representations would be, in this framework, the materialisation of shamanic visions.

Clottes identifies several elements of rock art that support this hypothesis. Animals, often represented without ground lines or respect for gravity, float on the walls like visions during trance. Geometric signs, points, lines, zigzags or grids, resemble those perceived in the different phases of shamanic trance . Composite beings, animals and humans mixed together, are part of this world of visions.

But perhaps one of the most powerful arguments is the relationship with natural reliefs. If one's mind is full of images of animals, a hollow in the rock highlighted by shadows will evoke the rump of a horse or the back of a bison. How could one not believe then that the animal spirits, encountered in visions, are there, half-released from the rock by the magic of the flickering torchlight, and ready to disappear back into it? In a few strokes, the artists perpetuated their power.

Cracks and hollows offered escapes to the depths of the rock, where spirits dwelled. Bones stuck into walls, finger marks and negative hands would be different ways of establishing direct contact with the forces underlying the rock, perhaps by uninitiated individuals who participated in the ritual . Negative hands, by merging with the wall, established a metaphorical connection with the spirit world.

The shamanic hypothesis, as Clottes acknowledges, has been widely criticised. The impossibility of knowing the meanings, the lack of formal proof, the vanity of ethnological comparisons, and the overly important role attributed to trance have all been questioned . However, Clottes argues that the shamanic hypothesis, building on previous knowledge, is currently the one that best explains the available data on the art of caves and objects of the Upper Palaeolithic .


Connection with research on the origin of art (S/Y/C)

The journey that Clottes traces through the history of interpretations of Palaeolithic art resonates deeply with the research we have been developing on the S/Y/C model of neuronal functioning and the Law of Biological Coherence (Mallo, 2023, 2025, 2026a, 2026b). Each of the theories reviewed by Clottes illuminates a different aspect of the function of art, but the shamanic hypothesis is the one that comes closest to an integrative understanding that connects art with mind, body, and cosmos.

The S (Survival) dimension manifests in all the interpretations that see in art a tool for survival, whether through hunting magic (to ensure food) or fertility magic (to guarantee the reproduction of species). Art, in this sense, is an extension of the homeostatic function: it not only helps to survive physically, but also allows people to process and share experiences, regulate emotions, and build group identity.

The Y (Symbolon) dimension is central in structuralism and, above all, in the shamanic hypothesis. Animals and geometric signs are not mere representations of reality, but symbols that refer to a system of shared meaning. Symbolon is the bridge between the internal world and the social world, between the shaman's visions and the community that interprets them. The cave, with its topography and reliefs, becomes a symbolic support where meaning is embodied in the rock.

The C (Wholeness) dimension manifests in the very structure of the caves and in the need to close a journey, to complete a ritual. The entrance to the cave, the descent into the depths, and the return to the light form a journey that seeks a totality, a coherence. Cave art, by integrating with the topography of the cave, is not a collection of isolated figures, but part of a whole that only acquires full meaning in its context.

Surgical Philosophy invites us to make a precise analytical cut in Clottes' article. It is not about choosing one of the theories as definitive, but about recognising that each has contributed to delimiting the field of the possible. Palaeolithic art, like art in general, is a complex phenomenon that is not exhausted in a single function or meaning. The shamanic hypothesis has the virtue of integrating the psychophysiological dimension (trance, hallucination) with the cultural and symbolic dimension, and with the ecological and social context. And it is precisely this integration that makes it the most fertile explanatory framework for our research.


Final considerations: interpretation as an open process

Jean Clottes' article reminds us that the interpretation of Palaeolithic art is a task that requires humility and, at the same time, audacity. Humility to recognise the limits of our knowledge, the unbridgeable distance that separates us from the minds that created those works, and the provisional character of all our hypotheses. Audacity to not renounce understanding, to dare to formulate questions and propose interpretive frameworks that make sense of the available data.

Clottes shows us that the history of interpretations of prehistoric art is not a history of linear progress, but of successive paradigm shifts, each of which has illuminated some aspects of the phenomenon while leaving others in the shadows. "Art for art's sake", sympathetic magic, structuralism, and shamanism are not so much false theories as partial perspectives, which have enriched our understanding as analytical techniques and ethnological knowledge have advanced.

The shamanic hypothesis, defended by Clottes and Lewis-Williams, represents perhaps the most ambitious attempt to integrate the different levels of analysis: the neuropsychological, the ethnological, the archaeological, and the symbolic. Its main contribution has been to restore to Palaeolithic art its dimension of embodied practice, of lived experience, of encounter between the human mind and the forces of the world.

And it is precisely this dimension that connects Palaeolithic art with contemporary art, and with our research on the origin of art in the Homo species. Art, from its earliest manifestations in the depths of the caves, has not only been a way of representing the world, but also a way of transforming it, of establishing a dialogue with the sacred, of exploring the limits of human experience.


References

Clottes, J. (2003). De « l'art pour l'art » au chamanisme : l'interprétation de l'art préhistorique. La revue pour l'histoire du CNRS, (8). https://doi.org/10.4000/histoire-cnrs.553

Mallo, B. (2023). La construcción neuro-simbólica. Una aproximación al funcionamiento del cerebro desde una perspectiva multidisciplinar [Doctoral thesis, University of the Basque Country - Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea]. ADDI Repository. http://hdl.handle.net/10810/62701

Mallo, B. (2025). Arte y biología: Una aproximación neurofilosófica al origen de la experiencia estética. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0E8Y5WZMK

Mallo, B. (2025). Art and biology: A neurophilosophical approach to the origin of aesthetic experience. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0E8Y6C2XN

Mallo, B. (2026a). De la filosofía quirúrgica a la ley de coherencia biológica S/Y/C: Hacia una investigación sobre el origen del arte en la especie Homo. https://isbn.bibna.gub.uy/catalogo.php?mode=detalle&nt=57196

Mallo, B. (2026a). De la filosofía quirúrgica a la ley de coherencia biológica S/Y/C: Hacia una investigación sobre el origen del arte en la especie Homo [Kindle edition]. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0GYGTJD5C

Mallo, B. (2026b). From surgical philosophy to the law of biological coherence S/Y/C: Toward a study of the origin of art in the Homo lineage. https://isbn.bibna.gub.uy/catalogo.php?mode=detalle&nt=57197


Autor / Author


Bernabé Mallo
 Doctor en Filosofía – Universidad del País Vasco / Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (UPV/EHU)
 Investigador independiente en neurofilosofía, evolución humana y origen del arte.
 

Bernabé Mallo
 PhD in Philosophy – University of the Basque Country / Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (UPV/EHU)
 Independent researcher in neurophilosophy, human evolution, and the origin of art.

Enlaces / Links


Página de autor Amazon / Amazon Author Page: https://www.amazon.com/author/bernabemallo
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9002-9728
Plataforma EHUenRed / Link EHUenRed:  https://www.ehu.eus/es/web/masterrak-eta-graduondokoak/red-latinoamericana-de-posgrados
Canal YouTube / Channel YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@neuroideas815
Canal YouTube / Channel YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBsf6OZ482NjST6QA-hvYtQ
Publicaciones y proyectos en desarrollo / Publications and projects: 
https://www.amazon.com/author/bernabemallo
https://ehuenred.theglocal.network/ideas/el-origen-del-arte-en-el-cerebro-de-makapansgat-al-moma-del-primate-al-sapiens